🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has announced it is pursuing compensation amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This move represents a direct warning from the Kremlin regarding plans to use immobilized Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on accounts in local news outlets, the central bank initiated a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

EU leaders are set to decide later this week on a plan to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal involves granting Ukraine with a large loan to finance its military and economic needs.

Most of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution acts as the primary keeper for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

EU officials have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the principle that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU countries following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Moscow, however, has called any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of reciprocal measures, including seizing European private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a key role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its assets. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

In comments interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a severe attack on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the latest legal action. It has previously noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in European nations are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that such assets can be identified," commented a lawyer from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities said they are developing measures to deter other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against European entities. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the detailed plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.

Ukraine would solely be obligated to repay the money in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the immense destruction caused during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an different approach for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she stated. "It also sends a powerful signal that if you cause all this destruction to another nation, you have to pay for the reparations."